Why, according to the Sophists, does this lead to moral relativism – the position that values
Question: Protagoras claims that, “man is the measure of all things.” He reaches this conclusion by arguing that neither the senses nor reason can provide ultimate certainty – which is to say that humans cannot know the way the world really is. Why, according to the Sophists, does this lead to moral relativism – the position that values are relative to the person, place, and time in which they exist (be as clear, precise, and rigorous as you can)? Accepting Protagoras’ arguments in defense of moral relativism, the “younger Sophists” further contend that the good life is the one in which we satisfy our desires, i.e., strive for as much pleasure and pleasant things as possible, and employ any means necessary to fulfill our desires. Why, based on their acceptance of moral relativism, might the “younger Sophists” claim that their account of the good life is the best possible life?
……………………Answer preview……………………..
According to Protagoras, man takes measure of everything. Research also shows that in his articles, Protagoras concludes in argument that neither moral reasoning nor right senses can give ultimate certainty. In his writings, he contends that not a single human being can be able to understand the world…………………..
APA
555 words
Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below
