Explain influences of this research on the notion of inevitability of intergroup conflict
Henri Tajfel’s ‘Minimal Group Paradigm‘
In the essay, please follow the instructions as below:
1. Introduction: summarize the research methodology and results from the Minimal Group Paradigm. (100 words)
2. Explain how the results from the Minimal Group Paradigm may complement and/or challenge the understanding of other sources of intergroup conflict (e.g., scarcity of resources, competition, history). (200 words)
3. Explain influences of this research on the notion of inevitability of intergroup conflict. (200 words)
Support the essay with specific references. You are to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.
READINGS
Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Chapter 29, “Intergroup Bias”
Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. SocialJustice Research, 17(2), 143–169.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Perdue, C. W., Dovidio, J. F., Gurtman, M. B., & Tyler, R. B. (1990). Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 475–486.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (The Nelson-Hall series in psychology) (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Burnham.
The psychology of intergroup relations by S. Worchel & W.G. Austin. Copyright 1986 by STEPHEN WORCHEL. Reprinted by permission of STEPHEN WORCHEL via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2001). The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes, and controversies. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 133–152). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Intergroup Processes by Brown, R. & Gaertner, S., in Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology Series. Copyright 2001 by Blackwell Publishing. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., Weber, U., & Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 461–473.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
the_ingroup_as_pars_pro_toto__projection_from_the_ingroup_onto_the_inclusive_category_as_a_precursor_to_social_discrimination. implicit_ingroup_favoritism__outgroup_favoritism__and_their_behavioral_manifestations. the_social_identity_theory_of_intergroup_behavior. the_social_identity_perspective_in_intergroup_relations__theories__themes__and_controversies. us_and_them__social_categorization_and_the_process_of_intergroup_bias._
Answer preview to explain influences of this research on the notion of inevitability of intergroup conflict
APA
774 words
