Home » Downloads » Topic: Debating CSR: the Merck Mectizan donation program

Topic: Debating CSR: the Merck Mectizan donation program

Topic: Debating CSR: the Merck Mectizan donation program

Topic: Debating CSR: the Merck Mectizan donation program

A major theme of this course is the debate over the meaning and desirability of CSR. We have examined several positions in this debate, including:

– normative stakeholder theories (e.g.Donaldson & Preston, Donaldson and Walsh, Stone, Stout, Wood, Williams, Davis), who support a broad notion of CSR

– instrumental (strategic) stakeholder theories (e.g. Drucker, Stone)

– normative stakeholder theories (e.g. Sternberg,Henderson, Hasnas,Jensen) who support only a narrow notion of CSR

– some of these stockholder theorists (e.g. Sternberg,Henderson) are right-wing criticsofbroad CSR, while others (e.g. Jensen) are right-wing critics of normative stakeholder based broad CSR but supporters of instrumental broad CSR.

– market-failure CSR theories (e.g. Heath) which support some aspects of broad CSR but not stakeholder theory per se

– left-wing critics of CSR (e.g. Corporate Watch, Bakan), who strongly disagree with normative stockholder theory but might agree that descriptive and legal stockholder theory are accurate regarding current business practice and law.

assignment___1_instructions__1_ (1)

Answer preview to topic: Debating CSR: the Merck Mectizan donation program

Topic: Debating CSR: the Merck Mectizan donation program

APA

2148 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below

 

Accounting

Applied Sciences

Article Writing

Astronomy

Biology

Business

Calculus

Chemistry

Communications

Computer Science

Counselling

Criminology

Economics

Education

Engineering

English

Environmental

Ethics

Film

Food and Nutrition

Geography

Healthcare

History and Government

Human Resource Managment

Information Systems

Law

Literature

Management

Marketing

Mathematics

Nursing

Philospphy

Physics

Political Science

Psychology

Religion

Sociology

Statistics

Writing

Terms of service

Contact