corroborative
. Please summarize the modern position on the requirement of corroborative testimony in a rape case, and how this is different than early common law. Why has there been a change?
Discuss fully and please list your references in Bluebook format.
Please note your essay answer should contain at least 250 words.
……………………Answer preview………………..
Corroborative evidence under law is any additional information that is offered to the trier to be used in support of the case at hand. The information is meant to help in the case and if a certain position had been taken by those in charge of that case, any additional information from a witness in support of that position is corroborative evidence. In modern position, corroborative evidence is not a must when dealing with a rape case. Despite the fact that statistics have shown that many rape prosecutions have resulted to acquittal, corroborative evidence which could be of help is not used as much in modern positions, (Barn and Kumari, 2015)………………………………
APA
386 words
