Why can some material that would normally be forbidden under the exclusionary rule

Why can some material that would normally be forbidden under the exclusionary rule

The constitutional rights of prisoners may be held in abeyance during the time they are on probation or parole.

The constitutional rights of prisoners may be held in abeyance during the time they are on probation or parole. They do not have the opportunity to interact with others who are also on probation and parole. The inmate, although on probation or parole, is still under the care, control, and custody of the department of corrections. One of the stipulations of his or her parole may be to refrain from interaction or contact with any other person who is a known felon. Why? What if this person was a family member? Why can some material that would normally be forbidden under the exclusionary rule be used to return a prisoner to prison or jail? See for example  Pennsylvania Board of Probations vs. Scott. Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

………………………Answer preview………………………………

Prisoners, according to the constitution also have rights. Although they are convicted as offenders, their well-being is still a concern that the constitution takes into consideration. However, during a time when a prisoner is on probation or parole, his or her constitutional rights may be suspended or in other words held in abeyance……………………….

APA
919 words

Get instant access to the full solution from yourhomeworksolutions by clicking the purchase button below